Бүтээлийн нэр
Report on the status of court reform in Mongolia
Зохиогч
Нээлттэй Нийгэм Форум
BRENT T. WHITE
Хэлбэр
Судалгааны тайлан
Салбар
Шүүх эрх мэдэл
Бүтээлийн товч
INTRODUCTION
Since the late 1990’s, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, USAID, GTZ, the Hanns-Seidel Foundation, and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), among others, have invested tens of millions of dollars to “reform” the Mongolian judiciary.
These reform efforts have been driven in large part by the belief by international donor agencies and development banks that economic growth depends upon the “rule of law”.
“Rule of law” in turn depends on a well-functioning and independent judiciary - which the public can trust to render fair, just and consistent decisions.
After nearly a decade of “reform,” however, public confidence in Mongolia’s judicial system remains decidedly low. More strikingly, public attitudes toward the judiciary have grown increasingly negative during this period of reform – with a “dramatic drop” in confidence in the Supreme Court and the Tsets (Constitutional Court) in particular.
A recent survey of public nationwide attitudes toward the courts found that only 28% percent of Mongolians believe they would be treated fairly were they to fi nd them-selves in court. In contrast, over 85% of Mongolians believe that the courts show favoritism to each of the following: the wealthy, public officials, relatives and friends of court personnel, and corporations. Likewise, over 75% of Mongolians believe judicial decisions are influenced by political considerations, judges’ own personal interests, and government officials.
Moreover, confidence in the courts is significantly lower – and increasingly so - among individuals who have had actual experience before courts than those who have not – with a three-fold increase since 2005 in negative perception of the courts among actual court users.
Out of concern that a decade of judicial reform has failed to appreciably improve public confidence in the courts, the Open Society Forum (OSF) has initiated a “Judicial Independence Project.”
As a first stage of this project, OSF conducted a needs’ assessment intended to gauge the actual progress of judicial reform in Mongolia, sort out perceived verses real de-ficiencies in the judicial system, and to guide OSF in developing a strategy moving forward. Below are the results of this needs assessment and recommendations as to how OSF might direct its Judicial Independence Project.
Since the late 1990’s, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, USAID, GTZ, the Hanns-Seidel Foundation, and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), among others, have invested tens of millions of dollars to “reform” the Mongolian judiciary.
These reform efforts have been driven in large part by the belief by international donor agencies and development banks that economic growth depends upon the “rule of law”.
“Rule of law” in turn depends on a well-functioning and independent judiciary - which the public can trust to render fair, just and consistent decisions.
After nearly a decade of “reform,” however, public confidence in Mongolia’s judicial system remains decidedly low. More strikingly, public attitudes toward the judiciary have grown increasingly negative during this period of reform – with a “dramatic drop” in confidence in the Supreme Court and the Tsets (Constitutional Court) in particular.
A recent survey of public nationwide attitudes toward the courts found that only 28% percent of Mongolians believe they would be treated fairly were they to fi nd them-selves in court. In contrast, over 85% of Mongolians believe that the courts show favoritism to each of the following: the wealthy, public officials, relatives and friends of court personnel, and corporations. Likewise, over 75% of Mongolians believe judicial decisions are influenced by political considerations, judges’ own personal interests, and government officials.
Moreover, confidence in the courts is significantly lower – and increasingly so - among individuals who have had actual experience before courts than those who have not – with a three-fold increase since 2005 in negative perception of the courts among actual court users.
Out of concern that a decade of judicial reform has failed to appreciably improve public confidence in the courts, the Open Society Forum (OSF) has initiated a “Judicial Independence Project.”
As a first stage of this project, OSF conducted a needs’ assessment intended to gauge the actual progress of judicial reform in Mongolia, sort out perceived verses real de-ficiencies in the judicial system, and to guide OSF in developing a strategy moving forward. Below are the results of this needs assessment and recommendations as to how OSF might direct its Judicial Independence Project.
Түлхүүр үг
Mongolians believe judicial decisions, Judicial Independence, reforms targeted at accountability, special anti-corruption measures
Бичигдсэн огноо
2008-03-04
Хуудсын тоо
53
Хэл
Англи
Бүтээл
Байршуулсан огноо
2020-10-11
Товч мэдээлэл үзсэн
3924
Бүрэн эхээр нь үзсэн
17
Эшлэлийн тоо
32
Санал болгож буй эшлэлийн загвар
Нээлттэй Нийгэм Форум
BRENT T. WHITE
“Report on the status of court reform in Mongolia” (2008), ... дахь/дэх тал.
Legaldata-аас унших боломжтой: https://legaldata.mn/b/797
Цуглуулганд нэмэх
Бүтээлийг цуглуулгандaa нэмэхийн тулд нэвтэрсэн байх шаардлагатай.
Бүртгэлтэй бол нэвтрэх | Бүртгэлгүй бол бүртгүүлэх
Бүртгэлтэй бол нэвтрэх | Бүртгэлгүй бол бүртгүүлэх
МЭДЭЭ, МЭДЭЭЛЭЛ

S2EP19. П.Намуун - Хууль бусаар мөрдөж мөшгих гэмт хэргийн шүүхийн шийдвэрт хийх дүн шинжилгээ
21 hours ago

2025 оны 4 дүгээр сарын эрэлттэй бүтээлийн чансаа
1 week ago

“Легал дата"-ийн ТУЗ-ийн дарга, доктор, олон улсын арбитрч Т.Алтангэрэл Сингапурын Олон Улсын Арбитрын Төв, Хөрөнгө Оруулалтын Маргаан Шийдвэрлэх Олон Улсын Төв, БНСУ-ын Арилжааны Арбитрын Зөвлөлийн арбитрчаар томилогдон ажиллаж байна
2 weeks ago

2025 оны 3 дугаар сарын эрэлттэй бүтээлийн чансаа
1 month ago
ШҮҮХИЙН ШИЙДВЭРИЙН ХУРААНГУЙ
-
Монгол Улсын шүүхийн тухай хуулийн 47 дугаар зүйлийн 47.6 дахь хэсгийн холбогдох зохицуулалт Монгол Улсын Үндсэн хуулийг зөрчсөн тухай Үндсэн хуулийн цэцийн 2025 оны 02 дугаар дүгнэлтийн тойм
2025-05-08
-
Төлбөр төлөгчийн худалдан борлогдоогүй эд хөрөнгийг төлбөр авагч төлбөрт тооцон авахаас татгалзсан нөхцөлд гүйцэтгэх баримт бичгийг буцааж, түүнийг дахин гүйцэтгүүлэхээр ирүүлэхгүй байхаар хуульчилсан нь Үндсэн хууль зөрчсөн
2025-05-08
-
Тавиул мал зудад үрэгдсэний эрсдэлийг малчин хариуцах уу, малын эзэн хариуцах уу?
2025-05-05
-
Өлзийгийн Эрдэнэ-Очир
2025-05-09 Магистрын ажилдуудаж байна ! -
Мягмаржавын Уянга
2025-05-08 Магистрын ажилдуудаж байна ! -
Judilogy
2025-05-07 Мэдээллийн хуудасдуудаж байна ! -
Батцэнгэлийн Тэлмэн, Эрдэнэбаатар Эрхбилгүүн
2025-05-06 Эрдэм шинжилгээний өгүүлэлдуудаж байна ! -
Цэнджавын Амарсанаа
2025-05-02 Эрдэм шинжилгээний өгүүлэлдуудаж байна ! -
Баттулгын Дөлгөөн
2025-05-01 Эрдэм шинжилгээний өгүүлэлдуудаж байна ! -
Лхагвасүрэнгийн Галбадар М.Мөнхбаатар
2025-05-01 Эрдэм шинжилгээний өгүүлэлдуудаж байна ! -
Д. Отгонбаяр
2025-04-30 Эрдэм шинжилгээний өгүүлэлдуудаж байна ! -
Пүрэвжалын Намуун
2025-04-29 Эрх зүйн шүүмждуудаж байна ! -
Одонхүүгийн Мөнхсайхан
2025-04-29 Судалгааны тайландуудаж байна !